-
The decision of the Estonian Triathlon Federation took a dispute to an international tribunal
In a dispute with the Estonian Triathlon Federation (ETA), we are representing distinguished triathlon referees Kati Raudsepp and Eero Raudsepp before the International Triathlon Union Tribunal. The tribunal has currently granted preliminary legal protection, requiring the ETA to reinstate Kati Raudsepp and Eero Raudsepp as active referees or to indicate that they are in good […]
-
Challenging unfair compensation at the European Court of Human Rights
We are representing Pärnu real estate developer Parem Kallas against the Estonian state during proceedings at the European Court of Human Rights. The complaint is for compensation for damages caused by expropriation for an unreasonable duration (more than 20 years). Unprecedented legal battle In this unprecedented dispute, the ECHR has, for the second time in […]
-
Successful representation of PlusPlus Baltic during civil proceedings before courts of all three instances
Our Dispute Resolution team successfully represented our client PlusPlus Baltic, the biggest pan-Baltic receivables management company’s branch in Latvia, in a civil dispute over the recovery of unjustly withheld funds and statutory interest before courts of all three instances. The merits of the case In the case, the opponent claimed damages and contractual penalties against […]
-
Successfully represented client in GAFTA Arbitration award recognition case
Our Dispute Resolution team successfully represented a client in a court case concerning the recognition and enforcement of a GAFTA (The Grain and Feed Trade Association of London) arbitration award in Latvia. Arbitral award The client had delivered goods under a contract, but the defendant had only partially settled the payment, remaining in debt for […]
-
The General Court of the European Union granted an interim relief application
We represent a client in a dispute with the European Commission before the General Court of the European Union. The core of the dispute revolves around the Commission’s decision to exclude the client from a procurement procedure, deeming their bid unacceptable. According to the Commission, the client’s proposal did not meet the minimum requirements. The […]