-
We successfully represented Elering in a dispute involving a EUR-100-million damages claim
We advised Elering in a court case in which the Harju County Court dismissed in full the claims brought by Pakrineeme Sadam (PNS) against Elering. The plaintiff sought approximately EUR 2.7 million in rent, plus interest, from Elering, and additionally, EUR 100 million in damages. The court dismissed both claims. The dispute arose from the […]
-
Victory in landmark arbitration dispute
We successfully represented the Baltic region’s leading commercial real estate management company during proceedings to annul an arbitral award. At the end of 2025, after an extensive dispute over rent indexation before the Court of Arbitration of the Estonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Tallinn Circuit Court confirmed the validity of the arbitral award and […]
-
Estonian glass facade manufacturer Windoor prevails in ICSID arbitration against Kazakhstan
The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Tribunal has ruled in favour of one of Estonia’s largest glass and aluminium facade manufacturers, Windoor, in its dispute against the Republic of Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan violated the obligation of fair and equitable treatment The Tribunal determined that Kazakhstan’s refusal to enforce the SCC Awards, the invalidation […]
-
Successful enforcement of two London arbitration awards in Estonia
We successfully represented a client in the enforcement of two foreign arbitral awards rendered under the rules of the Federation of Oils, Seeds, and Fats Associations (“FOSFA”) in London. Challenged due to the absence of a signature FOSFA is an international trade federation providing network, contracts, and supporting services for its members active in trading […]
-
Sorainen successful for client in libel dispute
We successfully represented Kirsti Valdstein-Timmer in the litigation regarding publishing incorrect facts and statements in media by Ekspress Meedia and the former Kroonika journalist Vahur Joa. Derogatory articles The cause of the dispute were articles written by Vahur Joa and published in the media in Autumn 2021 that were derogatory towards Kirsti Valdstein-Timmer. After the […]