-
Strengthening workplace practices at Tallinn Airport through employment law training
We delivered an employment law training session for Tallinn Airport, focusing on preventing issues and disputes arising from employment relationships. The training was tailored for representatives of the HR and legal teams, as well as occupational health and safety specialists. During the training, we analysed management approaches and work processes intended to prevent disputes, with […]
-
Challenge to procurement terms proves bidders can successfully secure amendments via dispute
We successfully represented the bus transport service provider SEBE in a dispute with Pärnumaa Ühistranspordikeskus over the lawfulness of the public procurement terms used to select a public transport service provider for the city of Pärnu. The dispute involved a challenge to 15 different terms of procurement, of which eight were successfully amended by agreement […]
-
We helped Milrem Robotics avoid years of litigation
We advised Milrem Robotics, a world‑leading developer of robotics and autonomous systems for the defence sector, in a dispute regarding a significant production challenge. The dispute concerned a multi-step contract valued at approximately EUR 3.3 million, making an efficient resolution essential. Following the outsourcing of the development and production of a critical subsystem, a long-term […]
-
Škoda secures contract award for BEMU train tender in Latvia
Sorainen provided legal support to the Škoda Transportation and Škoda Vagonka consortium in a tender for the first delivery of BEMU trains in Latvia. About the case On 9 October 2025, the state-owned company Autotransporta direkcija decided to award the contract to the Škoda consortium, confirming that its offer met all tender requirements. The proposed […]
-
Two landmark victories in public procurement disputes
We successfully represented IQVIA, a leading global provider in the field of life sciences, in two public procurement disputes regarding North Estonia Medical Centre’s (PERH) decision to disqualify and exclude IQVIA. The cases are notable because, in Estonian public procurement, errors of this kind (concerning who should be regarded as the correct applicant) have not […]